Patients Say Ask before Using Medical Records for Research

With electronic medical records creating an ideal source of data to inform quality care and new discovery, a key question emerges: How much say should patients have in how their data is used? A new study led by Michigan Medicine researchers finds that even when patients understand the overall benefit to society, they still want to be able to give consent at least once before their de-identified data is used for research. The feeling was especially strong among racial and ethnic minorities.

"What we heard was a resounding sense that people want to be able to control their data," says lead study author Reshma Jagsi, M.D., D.Phil., deputy chair of radiation oncology and director of the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine at the University of Michigan.

"Many patients indicated they fully intended to allow for their data to be used, but they wanted the respect of being told and having the chance to say no. Programs trying to facilitate use of data collected in routine patient care encounters for other purposes--even highly worthy ones like improving the quality of care and research-- need to be mindful of transparency and clarity in the communication of their goals and activities so patients don't feel violated when they find out how their data was used," Jagsi says.

In 2015 the Institute of Medicine advocated for developing learning health care systems, in which science, informatics, incentives and culture align to create a cycle of continuous learning and improvement. Learning health care systems tap into de-identified patient data from electronic medical records of participating medical practices to inform quality improvement, innovation and best practices.

While previous research suggested patients had some unease with their data being used for research without their permission, these earlier studies often did not focus on making sure patients understood how this research could improve care or the importance of including all possible data to maximize benefit to the community.

In this new study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, researchers used a novel approach called democratic deliberation. Participants were given information about why and how data is used, followed by facilitated small group discussions about the benefits and concerns. Participants were surveyed throughout the process to assess their attitudes toward use of de-identified patient data for research. Altogether, 217 cancer patients participated at four diverse sites in day-long democratic deliberation sessions.

The vast majority of participants - 97% - thought it was important to conduct medical research using de-identified electronic health records. Support for academic medical centers or community hospitals seeking to improve quality was high, but fewer people were comfortable with insurance companies or drug companies using their data, as well as hospitals using their data for marketing purposes.

Initial surveys showed 84% of participants thought it was important for doctors to ask patients at least once whether their de-identified data could be used for future research. That number dropped to 66% after discussion. A month later, 75% wanted to give permission.

Race and ethnicity played a significant role. White participants were less likely than non-white participants to value consent. Half of the minority participants expressed wanting to give consent every time their medical records were used, compared to a quarter of white participants. Jagsi says this discrepancy likely reflects historical injustices experienced by minority populations in the context of clinical research. She emphasized that systems must be structured in ways that all patients feel respected so that they do provide access to their data--especially since minorities are often underrepresented in research.

"Including data from diverse patient populations is crucial for quality improvement and discovery," Jagsi says. "At the same time, we do not want patients to feel they gave their information for one purpose and - albeit with good intentions - we are using it for another purpose. Policies around learning health care systems must be grounded in and respectful of public opinion if we are to realize the great promise of big data in health care."

Reshma Jagsi, Kent A Griffith, Rochelle D Jones, Chris Krenz, Michele Gornick, Rebecca Spence, Raymond De Vries, Sarah T Hawley, Robin Zon, Sage Bolte, Navid Sadeghi, Richard L Schilsky, Angela R Bradbury.
Effect of Public Deliberation on Patient Attitudes Regarding Consent and Data Use in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology.
Journal of Clinical Oncology. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01693.

Most Popular Now

Open Call SC1-DTH-12-2020: Use of Real-W…

The number of people with chronic illness is growing and almost half of them have multiple chronic conditions. Patients with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) have chronic multi-morbidities or chronic disease...

China to Take on Leading Role in Medical…

Asia, in particular China, has been advancing significantly on its way to a key role in geopolitics, says correspondent Frank Sieren - and towards spearheading developments in medical technologies. At...

Doctors Give Electronic Health Records a…

The transition to electronic health records (EHRs) was supposed to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare for doctors and patients alike - but these technologies get an "F" rating...

Artificial Intelligence Algorithm can Le…

Artificial Intelligence can be used to predict molecular wave functions and the electronic properties of molecules. This innovative AI method developed by a team of researchers at the University of...

Preventive Health Care Via App

Demand for apps for preventive health care is growing all the time. Particularly popular are diagnostic assistants that record physiological and fitness data. However, there are data protection concerns with...

Bittium Exhibits its Innovative High-Tec…

Bittium exhibits its innovative products and solutions for cardiology and neurology at Medica 2019, the leading international trade fair for the medical sector, on November 18 - 21 in Dusseldorf...

MEDICA 2019 + COMPAMED 2019 Due to Launc…

18 - 21 November 2019, Düsseldorf, Germany. From Monday until Thursday, the entire medical world and health care sector will once again meet in Düsseldorf. With a record participation of a...

Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithm …

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant global cause of mortality and morbidity with an increasing incidence, especially in low-and-middle income countries. The most severe TBIs are treated in intensive...

A Mobile App for Managing Mobile Medical…

Beginning of March 2019, Merci Charity Boutique association based in Bucharest, Romania started testing the "Mobile app for mobile medical units and cabinets", which helps the mobile dental practice to...

#FH2019 - The Leading International Conf…

13 - 15 November 2019, Berlin, Germany. This year the German capital will host again the main conference dedicated to Digital Health: Frontiers Health 2019, which will be held from the...

MEDICA and COMPAMED Hold their Own in a …

18 - 21 November 2019, Düsseldorf, Germany. The demand market for medical technology and medical products is becoming increasingly challenging and discriminating worldwide. Providers are adapting to this on a flexible...

Philips Launches its First Clinical Prod…

Royal Philips (NYSE: PHG, AEX: PHIA), a global leader in health technology, announced the U.S. debut of its new cognitive assessment platform IntelliSpace Cognition. Leveraging the power of artificial intelligence...